RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03867
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His home of record (HOR) be changed from Stockton, California, to
Jay, Florida.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His family that resided at the California address has moved and
no longer communicates with him.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) for Uniformed Service
Members, Appendix A, states that the HOR is the place recorded as
the home of the individual when commissioned, appointed,
enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any
correction made to a members HOR must be fully justified and the
home, as corrected, must be the members actual home upon
entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the
members convenience.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states there is no error
or justification that warrants a change in the applicants HOR.
The applicants records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at
which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. He also listed
Atwater, California as his HOR on his DD Forms 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United
States, dated 18 Jan 07 and 8 Dec 10.
The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 24 Sep 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).
As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2012-03867 in Executive Session on 9 May 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number
BC-2012-03867 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 12, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 13 Sep 12, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04328
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Elizabethtown, PA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. EXAMINERS NOTE: The applicant states his HOR reflects Elizabethtown, CA; however, it was confirmed that his records reflect Elizabethtown, PA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02679
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to Fremont, California. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02297
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Mariposa, California as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The applicant’s records reflect Mariposa, California as the state he lived in prior to entering the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524
The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04693 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from West Virginia to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520
In addition, Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...